No items found

Socioeconomic Status Tied to Survival After In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Nurses using ventilator on man in cardiac arrest.
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email

Key Takeaways

  • Higher socioeconomic status was found to be associated with an increased likelihood of receiving faster CPR in the hospital.
  • Patients with high socioeconomic status were significantly more likely to survive to hospital discharge with good neurological outcome, and to survive to 30 days.
  • Patients with high socioeconomic status were significantly more likely to receive prophylactic heart rhythm monitoring; this finding seemed to partially account for the observed differences in CPR delay.

HealthDay News–For patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), higher socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with a lower likelihood of receiving delayed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), according to a study published the European Heart Journal.

Jens Agerström, Ph.D., from Linnaeus University in Växjö, Sweden, and colleagues examined SES disparities in IHCA treatment and survival by assessing SES at the patient level, with education and income constituting SES proxies. Overall, 24,217 IHCAs from the Swedish Register of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation were analyzed.

The researchers found that high- vs low-SES patients were significantly less likely to receive delayed CPR (odds ratios, 0.89 and 0.98 for highly educated and high income, respectively) after controlling for age, gender, ethnicity, comorbidity, heart rhythm, etiology, hospital, and year. Patients with high SES were significantly more likely to survive CPR, to survive to hospital discharge with good neurological outcome, and to survive to 30 days. In secondary analyses, the investigators found that patients with high SES were significantly more likely to receive prophylactic heart rhythm monitoring; this finding seemed to partially account for the observed differences in CPR delay.

“The finding that SES differences remain after controlling for major demographic, clinical, and contextual factors suggests the presence of treatment bias/discrimination,” the authors write. “Such bias, where patients are treated differently due to their SES, may stem from prejudiced attitudes among hospital staff.”

Abstract/Full Text

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Want to continue reading this article?

Log in to your account